Your 2D:4D ratio

The always interesting
News in Brain and Behavioural Sciences Newsletter
this week pointed to an
Edmonton Journal article
where an McMaster University evolutionary psychologist
claims to have found that the length ratio of a woman’s ring to
index finger points to her sexual behaviour –
from fantasies to the number of partners she might have.

It has been known for a century (really?!) that the ratio between the
length of the second finger (2D) and the ring finger (4D)
varies between men and women and that a shorter 2D is the
more masculine characteristic.
Put your right hand flat on a table as see whether your
ring finger (4D) is longer then your index finger (2D).

Well, the finding is that shorter 2D (more male’ish) is
coorelated with higher prenatal testosterone levels and
that more male-like 2D:4D ratios on the
right hand were linked to higher SOI scores –
standard seven-item questionnaire called the
Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI),
which measures “a person’s” willingness to engage in
casual, uncommitted sex.
That is, high prenatal testosterone levels
lead to ‘male-like’ short-term mating tactics.
These tests were given to woman — shorter 2D indicated
a woman engages in more
“short-term mating tactics”.

So ladies, is your 2D shorter than your 4D?

One Response to “Your 2D:4D ratio”

  1. on 06 Sep 2004 at 6:13 am christina

    I am female and i have a ratio of 1.15. What does this mean?